|
1
|
- Professor Nermien Al-Ali
- Franklin Pierce Law Center
|
|
2
|
- This workshop will :
- Introduce you to strategic management of intellectual assets;
- Familiarize you with various forms of intellectual property & how
to make protection decisions;
- Provide you with hands-on knowledge on how to structure models and
choose tools for managing knowledge, innovation & intellectual
property in your organization.
- Provide insights into how to align intellectual assets with business
strategy.
|
|
3
|
- Goal of strategic intellectual asset management:
- “to identify all intellectual assets throughout the whole organization
in an economy where innovation drives business growth & enables
competitive performance, whereby the intellectual assets are aligned
with the business strategy”
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- 78% of corporate assets of Fortune 500 companies in US*
- 70% are knowledge workers – process & apply knowledge to new
situations
- Intellectual assets are the single most valuable asset of major
corporations in the world
- *PricewaterhouseCoopers Report 1999.
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- “Silicon Valley legend”*
- Not know what they knew
- Steve Jobs visited Xerox PARC.
- ‘Borrowed’ ideas like the mouse and graphical interface for Apple and
became a billionaire”
- *J. Krause, Will Xerox Shut PARC, The Standard 2000
|
|
9
|
- Innovation-intensive: High growth – 5%
- Various markets: packaging, transportation, appliances components,
home/office accessories, construction, industrial, textile
- Various technologies: heavy-duty coating, color measurement, new
colors, laser/security printing,
- Growth opportunities: security printing, traffic signage, ink jet
printing, special effects
- Challenges: performance, environmental safety, globalization pressures
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Capital: Any intellectual capability and human brainpower/knowledge that
enables value creation
- Assets: Any valuable codified knowledge that facilitates the innovation
process
- Property: Any intellectual asset that is legally defined & protected
- A& P enable value extraction & maximization
|
|
12
|
- Human:
- Employee knowledge skill & experience, core competencies
- Customer knowledge & feedback, customer base
- Relational:
- Networking with suppliers, customers, organizations, universities,
maybe even competitors
- Structural:
- Modus operandi of a company, style & reputation
- Culture & values,
- Organizational vision & leadership
|
|
13
|
- Value creation depends on
transfer of HC to CC, CC to SC, HC to SC & vice versa
- Both intellectual assets & property created
|
|
14
|
- Explicit codified knowledge
- Manuals
- Best practices
- Databases
- Codified R&D research
- Processes
- Reports
|
|
15
|
- A generic term for various rights provided by law to protect innovative
effort & economic investment in it. Includes:
- Patents
- Trade secrets
- Trademarks
- Copyrights
- Designs
|
|
16
|
- Protects:
- articles, compositions or processes (utility). (Also plant varieties
& designs)
- For: 20 years (14 &other)
- Provided:
- Idea is novel, useful, & non-obvious.
- Patent application contains an enabling disclosure of the best mode.
- Owned by: inventor unless has fiduciary duty, hired to invent, or
assigns the invention.
|
|
17
|
- Pros:strongest protection - independent creation & reverse
engineering prohibited
- Cons:
- Strict novelty & publication: some applications after 18months
- High costs & fees.
- Territorial – foreign filing a must within a year or 30 months (PCT)
|
|
18
|
- Strong if:
- Wide scope claims,
- Limited amendments during prosecution,
- Own improvement patents
- Beware of:
- Keeping lab notes to determine joint inventorship &first to invent.
- Any disclosure (commercial use or publication) prior to application. US
law allows one year from date of disclosure
- Misuse: tie in provisions, term extension
|
|
19
|
- Protects: Any information that derives its commercial value from being
(secret) not generally known to the public against appropriation by
improper means
- For: Period of secrecy
- Provided:
- Identified (notice to employees)
- Reasonable security measures
- Not generally known, kept secret
- Owned by: originating entity
|
|
20
|
- Pros:
- State & common law protection
- Injunctive relief available – GE case
- Cons:
- Reverse engineering permitted.
- Indirect costs involved
|
|
21
|
- Strong if:
- Identified & codified,
- Of ascertainable value,
- Good security measures
- Employee awareness (protection guidelines)
- Beware of:
- Disclosure agreements or provisions
- Employing former employees,
- Dos & Donts of competitive intelligence
|
|
22
|
- Protects: exclusive right to use a term, logo, or dress to to identify
the origin of goods & services
- For: Indefinite time
- Provided: there is use
- Owned by: user
|
|
23
|
- Pros:
- Branding & goodwill,
- Strong protection for popular marks against dilution,
- May extend to domain names (Cybersquating Act)
- Cons:
- Common law and state/national registration
- Complicated search procedure for state marks
- Interstate Commerce requirement
|
|
24
|
- Strong if: Highly distinctive
- Generic Descriptive Suggestive Arbitrary
- Aspirin ParknRide Browning Bag BASF, Bayer
- Apple
- Beware of:
- Naked licensing
- Genercizing use (Escalator, Cellophane, Xerox)
|
|
25
|
- Protects: expression when fixed in tangible medium. Right to make
reproductions, & derivative works
- For: 75 years &life, 95 years from publication, 120 years from
creation
- Provided: Fixed in tangible form
- Owned by: Author except work for hire doctrine unless stated otherwise
|
|
26
|
- Pros:
- Automatic protection. No notice required
- Cheap easy registration.
- Cons:
- Only covers artistic features (weak for software).
- Not infringed by independent creation
- Strong if:
- Work contains few functional elements
- Can be reproduced in various medium
- Beware of: Contractors work (website)
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- Three stages:
- I. Knowledge Management:
- Knowledge Audit: Know what you know & leverage it
- II. Innovation Management:
- Idea generation: Use brainpower to innovate
- Competitive Intelligence: Monitor your customer, market &
competition
- III. Intellectual Property Management:
- Strategic/Competitive positioning: Protection of intellectual assets
decisions
- Exploitation: Commercialize intellectual property
|
|
29
|
- Goals of KM
- 1. Audit - Know what you know and leverage it. A study: organizations
use only 20% of the knowledge they have. (O’Dell, 1998)
- 2. Create – Identify strategy to fill knowledge gaps
- 3. Leverage - Encourage employees to use their brainpower to process
& apply information to work situations, share knowledge & create
know-how
|
|
30
|
- Source: Frappaolo, “What’s Your Knowledge IQ”,
www.intelligentkm.com/feature/08/feat1.shtml
|
|
31
|
- How to work on knowledge gaps in knowledge base
- “Follower strategy”: lower knowledge acquisition cost curve by reverse
engineering & acquiring state-of-art knowledge (Daniele, 1997)
- Specialization strategy: Know what you know better
- Diversification strategy: know more
|
|
32
|
- Arrange as core competencies to identify gaps- Xerox listed core
competence in 28 knowledge areas
- How to cover gaps:
- Recruitment policy - personnel idea: type & characters of employees
to be aligned with vision & culture
- Invest in targeted training: (10% inc. educational level) resulted
in 8.6% increase in productivity
as compared to 3.4% increase of investing in equipment
- (Source 1995 Study by National center on Educational Quality of the
Workforce)
|
|
33
|
- How to create knowledge-sharing culture
- Recognition as an expert
- Connect it to productivity
- Criteria for promotion (PWC) – part of performance appraisals.
- Job design & description: % of time (3M)
- Financial/other reward for transfer of best practice. TI - NIHBIDIA Award, annual sharing day
1996
|
|
34
|
- Create & Discover: data warehousing & mining, content analysis
- Sharing: idea banks, knowledge centers, virtual R&D (Dupont),
computer conferencing, bulletin boards,
- Encourage communities of practice: Intranets, Cross-organizational
meetings, Best Practices database, expert pools (BP)
- General: knowledge mapping, inventory, measuring effectiveness
|
|
35
|
- Three stages:
- I. Knowledge Management:
- Knowledge Audit: Know what you know & leverage it
- II. Innovation Management:
- Idea generation: Use brainpower to innovate
- Competitive Intelligence: Monitor your customer, market &
competition
- III. Intellectual Property Management:
- Strategic/Competitive positioning: Protection of intellectual assets
decisions
- Exploitation: Commercialize intellectual property
|
|
36
|
- Two main types:
- Exploit change: Analysis of changes & opportunities they bring
- Create change: Prediction & introduction of changes (breakthrough)
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- Two main processes:
- Idea generation:
- Empower employees in the innovation process, and
- Provide a pool of new ideas
- Assess & implement
- Competitive intelligence:
- Monitor (& exploit) change in market trends, customer expectations,
& competitive landscape
- Detect threats, opportunities & developments
- Gather, process & distribute information to aid decision-making
|
|
39
|
- Dana Corporation
- 48 000 employee worldwide
- Every employee from CEO to new hire on plant floor: 2 ideas per month on
better ways in all areas of business
- Light Vehicles Structures Division in PA (3600people): total idea
submission: 8941(1991) to 63981 (1995).
- Goal: 80% idea submission & implementation.
- Implementation rate 90-95: 77%
- Profitability 40%+, productivity 13%+, morale: high - “feel empowered”
- Source: Morcott’ “Igniting a Firestorm of Creativity”, in Straight From
The CEO, 2000
|
|
40
|
- Two main processes:
- Idea generation:
- Empower employees in the innovation process, and
- Provide a pool of new ideas
- Assess & implement
- Competitive intelligence:
- Monitor (& exploit) change in market trends, customer expectations,
& competitive landscape
- Detect threats, opportunities & developments
- Gather, process & distribute information to aid decision-making
|
|
41
|
- Steps
- Plan the search: what sources to monitor
- Notice & Collect data (lawfully)
- Process - perceptual filtering
- Sense-making: transform to
insight : “so what” test
- Dissemenate to decision makers
- Formulate strategy
|
|
42
|
- Gather Critical Business Information:
- Strategic analysis & scenario planning:
- Environment forecasting; acquisition targets, location of new plants,
supplier evaluation
- Marketing planning
- Industry analysis, competitor analysis, new product introduction,
product portfolio, pricing
- Sales & marketing
- Sales cycle management, database marketing, sales forecasting,
promotion campaign assessment
- Source: www.skyrme.com/insights/9mkis.htm
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
- Three stages:
- I. Knowledge Management:
- Knowledge Audit: Know what you know & leverage it
- II. Innovation Management:
- Idea generation: Use brainpower to innovate
- Competitive Intelligence: Monitor your customer, market &
competition
- III. Intellectual Property Management:
- Strategic/Competitive positioning: Protection of intellectual assets
decisions
- Exploitation: Commercialize intellectual property
|
|
47
|
- Use IP as strategic tools for Competitive
Advantage:
- Determine competitive position compared to others in your industry &
other industries with same technology
- Block competition
- Increase Market share
|
|
48
|
- Block Competition Generate Revenue
- Use certain technology License
technology
- Riding on goodwill Franchise & Merchandise
- Copying work Create derivative work
- Use valuable info. Reduce cost & license
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
- 1997 Singer/songwriter David Bowie issued $55 million in bonds
securitized by albums he recorded before 1990
- Walt Disney grew from $2 to $22 billion in ten years
- Microsoft intellectual assets valued at $148 million in 1997
|
|
51
|
- Developed 7 designs of mounting the twin independent blades for closer
shaving
- Patented the design which could give strongest protection
- Communicated to consumers the feature that most portrayed the brand
image
- Choose a container that “had the proper masculine sound and feel when
ripped”!
- *Rivette& Kline, Discovering New Value in IP, HVRBR 54
|
|
52
|
- Patents to cover the twin blade mounting design
- Trademark to cover its trade dress, brand, & advertising slogans
- Copyright to cover product description
- Trade secrets to cover unpatented know-how
|
|
53
|
- Competitive positioning:
- Determine your FTO
- Determine goal of protection:
design around, exclude competition, save costs, improve goodwill
- Decide on level & type of protection: decision-making aids
- Identify desired position & draw future (Patenting & branding
strategies)
- Exploitation:
- Know your IP: Audit & portfolio creation
- Evaluate strength & value of IP
- Determine level & scope of investment
- Police, Enforce & Capitalize
|
|
54
|
- What: Acquire preliminary assurance that R&D activities are not in
areas protected by others
- How
- Define broadly field/areas covered by third parties & distinguish
activity if necessary
- Assess parameters of innovative activity: assess patents to design
around; assess © work to use functional elements; assess TM to exploit
if abandoned or weak
- More than IP searches
|
|
55
|
- Why - Benefits:
- Create a culture preventive of infringement
- Saves development time
- Avoid investment losses in creating/acquiring IP
- Guard against infringing third parties IP –
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
58
|
- Factors to consider
- Market success
- Benefits of different types of protection
- Risks assessment
- International filing – China (for patent & TM)
- Investment decisions
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
62
|
- Decision making tools:
- Expert opinions
- Decision trees
- Future scenario generation
- Patent analysis
- Market & consumer surveys
|
|
63
|
- Patenting strategies
- Patent-Enabled Grow - reinforce patent wall around a technology thru
M&A - acquire all that is available (Cisco & TI)
- Patent-Enabled Sell - sell dying business by finding who is using its
related patents
- Patent-Enhanced Fix - surround (maturing or aging) products with
patented accessories (Canon)
- (Source: Rivette & Kline, Rembrandts in the Attic)
- Consider value transference here
|
|
64
|
- VALUE TRANSFERENCE BETWEEN IPs STRATEGY
|
|
65
|
- Branding should always be considered
- Determine ‘critical drivers of customer retention’ in your business
(experimentation stage)
- Determine the brand promise or image
- Train & empower employees as ‘brand ambassadors’ (employee
satisfaction, service provision)
- Align points of customer contact with the brand promise
|
|
66
|
- Competitive positioning:
- Determine your FTO
- Determine goal of protection:
design around, exclude competition, save costs, improve goodwill
- Decide on level & type of protection: decision-making aids
- Identify desired position & draw future (Patenting & branding
strategies)
- Exploitation:
- Know your IP: Audit & portfolio creation
- Evaluate strength & value of IP
- Determine level & scope of investment
- Police, Enforce & Capitalize
|
|
67
|
- Steps:
- 1. Audit & create IP portfolios
- 2. Police – how not to misuse & lose
- 3. Enforce – litigation decisions
- 4. Capitalize on IP: strategic alliances & licensing
|
|
68
|
- Why
- Traditionally used for acquisitions to assess total market value of
company
- Can be enterprise wide or business related - depends on profit centers
- Weed out those not needed for business for assignments or donations
(Dupont $64M, Dow $50M)
- Create a portfolio to enable portfolio management & analysis
|
|
69
|
- How
- Look for patents (issued or pending), Processes & practices (trade
secrets or not), TMs (common law or registered), (C) are ideas being
expressed
- Trade secrets are a special case - legal requirements for protection
- Create Portfolios: product line, customer profile, IP type – remember to
note the competence to include as know-how & service
|
|
70
|
- Portfolio criteria:
- Expiry dates or life cycle
- In & out licenses, grant back provisions
- Franchises, merchandizing agreements
- Royalties rates
- Core or non-core IP
- Use portfolio analysis to
- Keep track of what you have
- Identify the strength, scope, life cycle of IP
- Aid decision making re enforcement & licensing
|
|
71
|
- Dow Chemical portfolio analysis:
- 51% Most valuable - direct application to high growth businesses (crown
jewels)
- 36% No direct use in current/planned products but valuable to others
- 13% Unlikely to be used - abandon or donate
|
|
72
|
- Steps:
- 1. Audit & create IP portfolios
- 2. Police – how not to misuse & lose
- 3. Enforce – litigation decisions
- 4. Capitalize on IP: strategic alliances & licensing
|
|
73
|
- Goal: to prevent loss of IP rights through unscrutinized business
tactics or transactions - Protection from inside
- Patents: Misuse; Antitrust
- Trademarks: Naked licensing or acquiescence; Genercizing
- Copyrights: too many functional elements; Antitrust
- Trade secrets: leakage (billions); Unreasonable security measures;
Computer hacking
- Risk to reputation or corporate image: use of suppliers &
distributors; Public announcements
|
|
74
|
- Steps:
- 1. Audit & create IP portfolios
- 2. Police – how not to misuse & lose
- 3. Enforce – litigation decisions
- 4. Capitalize on IP: strategic alliances & licensing
|
|
75
|
- Goal: to prevent third parties from free riding on the strength of your
IP. Protection from outsiders
- Monitor infringing activities of competitors:
- Internal unit- IBM
- Specialized outside third parties - some CI firms
- Rely on customers feedback
- Enforcement decisions:
- To litigate or
- Not to litigate
|
|
76
|
- Protection from outsiders:
- Litigation decisions:
- Assess strength of IP, scope
& coverage, and market position - ie value IP
- Effect of litigation on image or reputation,
- Any legal or other ramifications e.g. adverse effects on working
relations
- Effectiveness - probability of success & possible remedies
- Weigh costs involved against
expected award of damages
- Alternative measure: offer (cross) license, arbitration, settlement
|
|
77
|
- Steps:
- 1. Audit & create IP portfolios
- 2. Police – how not to misuse & lose
- 3. Enforce – litigation decisions
- 4. Capitalize on IP: strategic alliances & licensing
|
|
78
|
- IP-based strategic alliances
- Merger & Acquisitions
- Outsourcing R&D
- Collaborative agreements with universities
- Spin-out: to establish a company/business wholly focused on exploitation of a certain technology
(Eastman Chemical)
|
|
79
|
- IP Licensing: Adopt active licensing strategy
- License to:
- Expand the business by entering new markets both territorially and
field-wise
- Market IP to competitors for
non-competing uses and to non-competitors
- Create merchandize (excluding patents & trade secrets)
- Generate revenue (IBM, Dow )
- Improve your technology: cross-licensing & grant back
- Get customer feedback through technical assistance
|
|
80
|
- Types of licensing:
- Technology licensing: patents & trade secrets
- Software licensing: (C), TM
- Franchizing: TMs, trade dress, trade secrets, (C)
- Merchandizing: right of publicity, character TMs, design (C)
|
|
81
|
- IP Search systems: uspto.gov,
- IP Inventory & tracking systems: pl-x.com, dennemeyer.com,
thetso.com
- IP M&A tracking: competitive intelligence, thedeal.com, chi.com,
patentinvestor.com, mergerstat.com
- IP Valuation & licensing tools: IP E-Bays: IPEX.com, Yet2.com,
patentvaluepredict.com
|
|
82
|
|